Skip to main content
Gruv.ai logo
Classification Risk

Free Contractor Classification Checker

Assess misclassification risk across US IRS 20-factor test, UK IR35, and EU Platform Work Directive rules through a 15-question directional scorecard.

US · UK · EU15-question scorecardDirectional

Not legal advice

This tool provides a directional assessment based on common classification tests. Confirm the result with qualified counsel in each jurisdiction.

  • Scoring reflects common factors from the IRS, IR35, and EU Platform Work Directive.
  • Actual classification depends on specific facts and contract terms.

Questionnaire

Answer 15 questions to see classification risk across key jurisdictions.

0/15 answered

Step 1 of 15

Control

Does the client control your work schedule or daily tasks?

Classification is a fact pattern, and facts move

The decision is usually made once, by whoever set the engagement up, and then left alone. That is where exposure accumulates, because the arrangement keeps changing after the paperwork stops. The contractor picks up a standing Monday meeting, then a set of hours, then a company laptop and an internal email address, then a manager who assigns the week. Each step is reasonable on its own and none of them triggers a review. Two years later the answer to the question this checker asks is different from the answer at signing, and nothing in the file records the change.

The federal standard itself is mid-move, which is worth knowing before treating any output as settled. The 2024 rule with its six economic reality factors has not been repealed and still governs private litigation under the Fair Labor Standards Act, while Field Assistance Bulletin 2025-1 told Wage and Hour investigators in May 2025 to stop applying it. In February 2026 the department proposed rescinding it and reinstating a modified version of the 2021 framework, built on two core factors, control and opportunity for profit or loss. Comments closed on 28 April 2026, and no final rule had issued by the end of August 2026.

The most common defense is the contract, and it is the weakest one. A written agreement stating that the worker is an independent contractor describes an intention, and the tests look at what happened: who controlled the work, who could profit from doing it well, who supplied the tools, how permanent the relationship was. Courts apply their own precedent whichever version of the federal rule is current, and several states run stricter tests, with California, Massachusetts and New Jersey the ones most often cited. Keep evidence for the facts, because the contract gets read alongside them.

Assumptions and sources

Which tests the questions follow

The questions track factors three real regimes weigh. The point values that turn your answers into a score were written for this page, and no authority publishes them.

What it assumes

  • One engagement is assessed at a time, against United States, United Kingdom and European Union framings in parallel.
  • Each answer carries a per-jurisdiction point value, and the score shown is your total over the highest total the question set can reach, as a percentage.
  • A question left unanswered still counts in that denominator, so a part-finished check reads low.
  • The label changes at 70 and at 40, and the actions under a result come from a stored list for that band.
  • A higher score reads as more employment-like, which is a direction rather than a determination.
  • Answers describe how the engagement runs in practice rather than how the contract reads.

What it leaves out

  • Any determination. Classification turns on the full facts of a relationship and is decided by authorities and courts.
  • State and member-state rules, including the stricter tests some US states apply.
  • The contract itself, which can support or undermine what the answers describe.
  • Consequences. Back taxes, social contributions and penalties follow their own rules per jurisdiction.

Where the numbers come from

The United States factors
Published sourceThe common law rules group the evidence into behavioural control, financial control and the type of relationship, which is the structure the question set follows. Independent contractor or employee, IRS
The United Kingdom factors
Published sourceThe off-payroll working rules apply contract by contract, and HMRC publishes its own check-employment-status tool for the determination itself. Understanding off-payroll working (IR35), HMRC
The European Union framing
Published sourceThe platform work directive requires member states to put in place a rebuttable legal presumption of employment, which is the direction the EU column reflects. Directive (EU) 2024/2831 on platform work (EUR-Lex)
The point values
Our own assumptionHand-assigned per question and per jurisdiction so the factors rank against each other. They are ours, and none of the three regimes scores this way.

Assumptions and sources checked 5 September 2026. Published figures move on their own schedule, so confirm anything you rely on against the authority that issues it.

Process

How it works

  1. 01

    Pick the jurisdiction

    US, UK, or EU rule set to anchor the scorecard.

  2. 02

    Answer the 15 questions

    Day-to-day control, integration, and financial factors.

  3. 03

    See the risk score

    0-100 with a plain-language classification risk band.

  4. 04

    Act on the findings

    Adjust engagement terms or route through compliant hiring.

Frequently Asked Questions

How should I use this classification score?+
A directional assessment before you structure the engagement. Classification depends on facts and jurisdiction, so confirm with qualified counsel where risk is material.
Which jurisdictions are covered?+
The questionnaire maps common factors from the US IRS guidance, UK IR35, and the EU Platform Work Directive.
What should I do if the risk is high?+
Adjust engagement terms, reduce day-to-day client control, or route through compliant employment/MoR/EOR workflows where required.
Does the result replace a contract review?+
No. The result is a starting point. Contracts and day-to-day practices must align.
Will you store my answers?+
Your answers are stored locally in your browser for convenience. They are not sent to a server.

Classification is the gate. Gruv is the path

In supported corridors, Gruv contracts with the worker directly as Merchant of Record. Shifting the operational compliance surface the classification check just surfaced.

Many teams start with a narrow launch in weeks.