Trace the data path
List what enters Gruv, which system handles sensitive values, what the payment or verification provider returns, and which records your team can export.
Security and launch readiness
Review the real workflow—not a generic trust checklist
Start with the data path, people, providers, markets, and payment methods you plan to use. Then answer the security and coverage questions that can actually change your launch.
Begin with three boundaries
Make the review match the launch
Map people to actions
Name who can prepare, approve, process, retry, hold, release, or export a record. Review the exact role and permission boundary for the enabled workflow.
Separate Gruv from provider roles
Confirm which provider issues receiving details or moves funds, which account holds the relationship, and which references return to Gruv for status and reconciliation.
What the review can cover
Give every launch question a clear place to land
| Review area | What Gruv can keep connected | What to confirm for launch |
|---|---|---|
| Payout-batch controls | Current services support permission-gated import, item review, processing, status and reason details, idempotency, and CSV export for enabled payout workflows. | Confirm the tenant mode, approver roles, provider route, funding source, and execution policy for your account. |
| Billing and payment records | Invoice, payment-link, provider-event, adjustment, refund, and dispute paths can retain operational references around a billing flow. | Confirm the contracted seller, payment provider, enabled methods, tax responsibilities, and accounting handoff for the proposed program. |
| Sensitive-data boundaries | Raw health information and card details do not belong in ordinary notes, files, exports, or support requests. Card-data scope depends on the exact entry and processing path. | Choose the approved entry point, provider account, token or status returned, and support process before launch. |
| Market and method readiness | Coverage is a combination of payer and recipient country, entity type, currencies, funding path, payout method, provider setup, and program approval. | Confirm the complete intended flow instead of planning from a headline country count. |
A review sequence teams can follow
Turn open questions into a clear decision
- 01
Bring one proposed workflow
Use a real invoice, payable file, payout batch, or payment request. Name the customer, recipient, entities, markets, currencies, and desired method.
- 02
Draw the system and provider boundary
Mark where data enters, which service owns each decision, where funds move, and which identifiers or status events return to Gruv.
- 03
Record controls and open questions
Capture access roles, approvals, holds, retries, exports, sensitive-data limits, provider dependencies, and the decisions still open.
- 04
Approve only the scope you reviewed
Keep new countries, currencies, methods, providers, and data categories as separate expansion decisions instead of assuming the first review covers them.
Deeper review pages
Open the resource that matches the next question
HIPAA and payment-card boundaries
See where PHI and raw card details belong before connecting a workflow.
Service-provider review
Prepare the provider, purpose, data-category, hosting, and transfer questions for procurement.
Payment rails
Review the exact corridor, funding, provider, status, and settlement questions for a payment path.
Privacy
Read how the public website and current services describe collection, sharing, consent, and retention.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Gruv publish a security certification on this page?+
This page is a practical review guide, not a SOC, ISO, PCI, or similar certification. Bring your security questions and we’ll focus the review on the workflow you plan to use.
How should we confirm country and currency coverage?+
Map the payer country, payment currency, recipient country, settlement currency, entity types, funding path, payout method, and provider account together. Coverage for one part does not establish the full flow.
What should we bring to a security review?+
Bring the proposed data flow, field inventory, user roles, payment or verification providers, launch markets, integration path, support process, and the questionnaire your reviewers use.
Can we review a future expansion at the same time?+
Yes. Keep the initial launch and future expansion as separate decisions, because a new market, method, provider, or sensitive-data category can change the review.
Where can we review provider dependencies?+
Use the service-provider review page to prepare the questions, then request the current named provider schedule for the exact modules and markets in your proposed rollout.
Bring the workflow. Map the review.
Show us the proposed data path, user roles, providers, markets, and methods. We’ll map the decisions that matter for a confident rollout.
Security and coverage are reviewed for the workflow in scope.