Free Compliance Review Matrix
Add each market or corridor, choose the attention level your team wants across five review areas, and copy the follow-up list.
Build the review around your facts
See where your launch needs a closer look
Add the markets or corridors in your plan, then choose the level of review your team wants for each area. The matrix organizes your assessment; it does not assign country risk on Gruv’s behalf.
| Review area | Attention level |
|---|---|
| Restricted-party and sanctions review | |
| Customer or business verification | |
| Payment and banking constraints | |
| Tax and documentation questions | |
| Local regulatory review |
Not assessed
5
Focused review
0
Specialist review
0
A level is worth what the next step says
Setting a level on a grid changes nothing on its own, and anyone who has sat through a quarterly review already knows it. Focused review is a feeling until somebody writes down what would take it back to standard, and a completed grid is a common way for a review to look finished while every question in it stays open. The matrix earns its place through the field under each market, where the next step and its owner get written down in words somebody else can act on. Count the markets carrying a level and no next step before anything else. That count is the finding.
Scale is what makes the discipline necessary. Six markets against the five review areas here is thirty cells, and a first pass that lands eight of them at focused review and three at specialist produces a queue of eleven items, which is a quarter of work for a team doing this alongside its real job. Order it by what is blocked: a check that stops a payment run this month outranks a stronger control on a market you have no volume in yet. The copy summary is the artifact to circulate, since it carries the steps and the owners.
The failure mode is age. A cell sitting at focused review for two quarters has stopped being a review item and become a decision nobody made, and the grid cannot show you that, because a level carries no date of its own. Record when each level was set, revisit on a fixed cadence, and treat anything older than the cadence as escalated by default. The question to ask at that review is short: has the fact changed, has the owner changed, or has nothing happened. Only the last of those needs a different answer from last time.
The matrix records your assessment
Nothing on this page rates a country. It records the level of review your team wants for each market and each area, so one screen holds your own judgement.
What it assumes
- You add the markets you care about and set a level per review area.
- Levels are labels you pick. The page counts how many cells sit at not assessed, focused review and specialist review.
- A blank cell is treated as unassessed rather than as low risk.
- The board lives in the page while it is open. Nothing is stored, so copy the summary out before you leave.
What it leaves out
- Any country risk index, sanctions list or regulatory rating.
- Sector rules, licensing questions and the thresholds that make a market harder than it looks.
- Currency and capital controls, which often decide feasibility before compliance does.
- Verification. The picture is as good as the assessments entered into it.
Where the numbers come from
- Country risk levels
- Our own assumptionEntirely yours. Shipping stored country ratings would put a number on a page that no one could defend six months later.
- The review areas
- Our own assumptionFive areas written for this page and repeated under every market you add, so each market gets asked the same five questions.
Assumptions and sources checked 5 September 2026. Published figures move on their own schedule, so confirm anything you rely on against the authority that issues it.
How it works
- 01
Name the scope
Add the market, corridor, or launch flow your team is reviewing.
- 02
Choose attention levels
Mark each area as not assessed, standard, focused, or specialist review.
- 03
Add the next step
Name the follow-up or owner that will move the review forward.
- 04
Copy the summary
Share with compliance leadership for prioritization.
Related guides
How to Conduct an Annual AML Risk Assessment for Your Payment Platform
Turns an informal grid into the documented, repeatable assessment an auditor asks to see.
Read the guideWhat Non-Compliance Costs Gig Platforms Before Market Expansion
The attention levels have no anchor. This supplies the consequence data to calibrate high against medium.
Read the guide8 Resilient Compliance Controls for Payment Platforms in 2026
The control inventory to draw the follow-up list from, so each row maps to something a team can own.
Read the guideFrequently Asked Questions
Does Gruv assign a risk rating to a country?+
What does “not assessed” mean?+
What belongs in the next-step field?+
Can I share the matrix?+
Does the matrix replace screening or local review?+
Review queue built. Keep the follow-ups moving
Gruv can keep supplied readiness states, reason details, payment status, and finance references connected while your team resolves the open checks.
Many teams start with a narrow launch in weeks.
