Skip to main content
Gruv.ai logo
Review Matrix

Free Compliance Review Matrix

Add each market or corridor, choose the attention level your team wants across five review areas, and copy the follow-up list.

Your assessment5 review areasAction list

Build the review around your facts

See where your launch needs a closer look

Add the markets or corridors in your plan, then choose the level of review your team wants for each area. The matrix organizes your assessment; it does not assign country risk on Gruv’s behalf.

Review areaAttention level
Restricted-party and sanctions review
Customer or business verification
Payment and banking constraints
Tax and documentation questions
Local regulatory review

Not assessed

5

Focused review

0

Specialist review

0

A level is worth what the next step says

Setting a level on a grid changes nothing on its own, and anyone who has sat through a quarterly review already knows it. Focused review is a feeling until somebody writes down what would take it back to standard, and a completed grid is a common way for a review to look finished while every question in it stays open. The matrix earns its place through the field under each market, where the next step and its owner get written down in words somebody else can act on. Count the markets carrying a level and no next step before anything else. That count is the finding.

Scale is what makes the discipline necessary. Six markets against the five review areas here is thirty cells, and a first pass that lands eight of them at focused review and three at specialist produces a queue of eleven items, which is a quarter of work for a team doing this alongside its real job. Order it by what is blocked: a check that stops a payment run this month outranks a stronger control on a market you have no volume in yet. The copy summary is the artifact to circulate, since it carries the steps and the owners.

The failure mode is age. A cell sitting at focused review for two quarters has stopped being a review item and become a decision nobody made, and the grid cannot show you that, because a level carries no date of its own. Record when each level was set, revisit on a fixed cadence, and treat anything older than the cadence as escalated by default. The question to ask at that review is short: has the fact changed, has the owner changed, or has nothing happened. Only the last of those needs a different answer from last time.

Assumptions and sources

The matrix records your assessment

Nothing on this page rates a country. It records the level of review your team wants for each market and each area, so one screen holds your own judgement.

What it assumes

  • You add the markets you care about and set a level per review area.
  • Levels are labels you pick. The page counts how many cells sit at not assessed, focused review and specialist review.
  • A blank cell is treated as unassessed rather than as low risk.
  • The board lives in the page while it is open. Nothing is stored, so copy the summary out before you leave.

What it leaves out

  • Any country risk index, sanctions list or regulatory rating.
  • Sector rules, licensing questions and the thresholds that make a market harder than it looks.
  • Currency and capital controls, which often decide feasibility before compliance does.
  • Verification. The picture is as good as the assessments entered into it.

Where the numbers come from

Country risk levels
Our own assumptionEntirely yours. Shipping stored country ratings would put a number on a page that no one could defend six months later.
The review areas
Our own assumptionFive areas written for this page and repeated under every market you add, so each market gets asked the same five questions.

Assumptions and sources checked 5 September 2026. Published figures move on their own schedule, so confirm anything you rely on against the authority that issues it.

Process

How it works

  1. 01

    Name the scope

    Add the market, corridor, or launch flow your team is reviewing.

  2. 02

    Choose attention levels

    Mark each area as not assessed, standard, focused, or specialist review.

  3. 03

    Add the next step

    Name the follow-up or owner that will move the review forward.

  4. 04

    Copy the summary

    Share with compliance leadership for prioritization.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does Gruv assign a risk rating to a country?+
No. The matrix reflects the attention level your team selects for its own market or corridor review.
What does “not assessed” mean?+
It means your team has not chosen a review level for that area yet. Use the count to see where the first follow-up belongs.
What belongs in the next-step field?+
Add a concrete follow-up or owner, such as confirming the bank route, refreshing a screening result, or obtaining local guidance.
Can I share the matrix?+
Yes. Copy the review summary to share each selected level and next step internally.
Does the matrix replace screening or local review?+
No. It organizes the review work and makes open checks visible. Complete the underlying screening, provider, tax, and local reviews in the appropriate systems.

Review queue built. Keep the follow-ups moving

Gruv can keep supplied readiness states, reason details, payment status, and finance references connected while your team resolves the open checks.

Many teams start with a narrow launch in weeks.