Gruv Logo
Recon Detector

Find the reconciliation gaps hiding in your close

Surface likely reconciliation failure patterns and the process fixes for each. Focus the close-cycle cleanup on the highest-impact breakpoints.

Pattern libraryProcess fixesClose-ready

Reconciliation diagnostic

Answer 10 questions about your reconciliation process.

How many systems are involved in reconciliation?
How often do you reconcile payouts?
How do you handle FX conversions?
Are provider fees captured separately?
How are transactions matched?
Do you reconcile status changes (pending, failed, reversed)?
How are chargebacks and refunds handled?
Are consistent reference IDs used across systems?
Do you batch payouts?
How do you handle exceptions?

Process diagnostic

Use this detector to surface likely reconciliation breakpoints and prioritize fixes before they become close-cycle issues.

Process

How it works

  1. 01

    Describe the process

    Volume, rails, close cadence, team structure.

  2. 02

    Flag pain points

    Where the close cycle stalls or totals disagree.

  3. 03

    Match against patterns

    Tool maps inputs to known failure patterns.

  4. 04

    See the process fixes

    Ranked actions for the close next month.

Frequently Asked Questions

How are errors detected?+
The tool compares your process inputs to common reconciliation failure patterns.
Does this integrate with my ledger?+
Not directly. Use the detector to surface likely process breakpoints before you change ledger logic or controls.
Can I export the results?+
Yes. Use the copy top issues button.
Should I still audit my records?+
Yes. Use it to focus audit attention on the process gaps most likely to create close-cycle pain.
Is this financial advice?+
Treat it as a process diagnostic for finance ops teams, then validate the findings against your records and close controls.
Global network background

Errors surfaced. Reconciliation rebuilt.

Gruv's reporting and reconciliation module outputs provider references, status transitions, and ERP-ready feeds so close stops being a monthly archaeology project.

Many teams pilot in weeks; timelines depend on scope and integrations.